Peer Review Committee: Difference between revisions

From Digital Square
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(70 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:


==Terms of Reference==
Digital Square's Peer Review Committee (PRC) comprises a diverse set of the foremost leaders and thinkers in digital health technology including country governments, donor organizations, implementing organizations, technology vendors, and other constituencies. The PRC plays a critical role as technical experts who assess the technical and programmatic appropriateness of submitted concept notes and applications through Digital Square Notices. The PRC provides feedback, which helps the Digital Square [[Board]] to prioritize investments in high-quality digital health products and services.
Peer Review Committee Governance Overview


1.0. Role of the Peer Review Committee
The Peer Review Committee is bound by the [[Peer Review Committee Membership Policy]], which has been approved by the [[Board]]. Any substantive changes to the policies require board approval.
• The PRC is not a governing body and its recommendations to the Governing Board are non- binding; however, the PRC plays a critical role as technical experts, assessing the technical and programmatic appropriateness of submitted proposals. The PRC’s role is to:
• Evaluate proposals against global goods criteria and provide technical feedback to authors
• Evaluate the programmatic and contextual appropriateness of a proposal in meeting health
system challenges.
• Evaluate submitted proposals and assign green, amber, or red lit status.
2.0. Responsibilities
• Review all investment proposals, utilizing the global goods criteria.
• Support the dhi by voting on proposals to move forward for investment, investigate further, or
decline outright.
• Support the dhi management team by providing additional technical guidance as requested in regard to green or amber lit investment proposals.
• Share knowledge and provide technical and strategic advice in areas of expertise. 3.0 Composition
The PRC is comprised of a diverse set of the foremost leaders and thinkers in digital health technology. The PRC does not have a limit on the number of Members. Seats are allocated to organizations, referred to as Member Organizations. There is no term limit. The PRC is comprised of Member Organizations and Representatives who meet the following membership criteria:
• Are recognized as experts in global health informatics, information technology, software development, and/or interoperability.
• Have expertise in regional and global digital health systems.
• Fulfill a balanced representation of the diverse group of stakeholders in digital health, including country governments, donor organizations, implementing organizations, technology vendors, and other constituencies.
• Willingness to comply with required participation as described in the governance documents.
Current
• Center for Disease Control
• African Center for eHealth Excellence
• Asian eHealth Information Network
• United States Agency for International Development
• International Telecommunication Union
• Swedish Program for ICT in Developing Regions
• United Kingdom Department for International Development
• Digital Impact Alliance
• Health Data Collaborative’s Digital Health and Interoperability Working Group
o RTI International
o Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health o MEASURE Evaluation
o IntraHealth
4.0 Conflict of interest
Members will disclose organizational or personal/financial conflicts before proposal review. The Chair will determine the scope of the conflict and the necessity for recusal. It is important to note that members are not likely to be recused from the review and feedback process on a proposal, but rather just voting, as their feedback is integral to the “peer” in Peer Review Committee. This will be applied fairly but may vary by situation.
5.0 Voting
Each PRC member organization receives one vote. Representatives and Alternates should come to a consensus in order to cast one organizational. All votes are weighed equally. PATH as the ex officio chair does not have a vote. The PRC member organizations cast their votes for green-, amber-, or red-light on the proposals. The breakdown of the organizational votes is then communicated to the Governing Board.
membership:
In the case of the DH&I WG group, each organization within the group receives one vote, all of which are weighed equally. The majority vote within the DH&I WG is then cast as the DH&I WG organizational vote. In the event of a tie between green and amber, the vote will be cast as green. In the event of a tie between green and red, the vote will be cast as amber. In the event of a tie between amber and red, the vote will be cast as amber.


==Current Membership==
==Current Membership==
Digital Square's Peer Review Committee is comprised of the following organizations.
Digital Square's Peer Review Committee is comprised of the following individuals:


* African Centre for eHealth Excellence (Acfee)
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/nelly-ale-bscn-mph-30109241/ Nelly Ale]
* Asia eHealth Information Network (AeHIN)
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/saurav-bhattarai-348a334a/ Saurav Bhattarai]
* Digital Square (ex officio)
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/sean-blaschke-8910087/ Sean Blaschke]
* Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/pierredane/ Pierre Dane]
* Department for International Development (DFID)
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/markdezalia/ Mark DeZalia]
* Digital Impact Alliance (DIAL)
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/vikas-dwivedi-827b6923/ Vikas Dwivedi]
* Health Data Collaborative (HDC) via the Digital Health & Interoperability Working Group including:
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/pape-amadou-gaye-185b232/ Pape Gaye]
** IntraHealth International
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/siobhangreen/ Siobhan Green]
** Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/calumhandforth/ Calum Handforth]
** MEASURE Evaluation
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/mthulse/ Matthew Hulse]
** RTI
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/carlkinkade/ Carl Kinkade]
* International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/gregory-kuzmak-a9344625/ Greg Kuzmak]
* Swedish Program for ICT in Developing Regions (SPIDER)
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/alain-labrique-a678a7/ Alain Labrique]
* United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/cassie-morgan-287848183/ Cassie Morgan]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/ssmusoke/ Stephen Musoke]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/christopherneu/ Chris Neu]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/walter-ndesanjo-69443431/ Walter Ndesanjo]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/emily-george-nicholson-98a453a/ Emily Nicholson]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/netsanet-animut-aa065138/ Netsanet Nigussie]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/nsaghurwe-alpha-pmi-acp-pmp-54578351/ Alpha Nsaghurwe]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/marlon-ralph-nyakabau-08729652/ Marlon-Ralph Nyakabau]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/martin-osumba-7142a123/ Martin Osumba]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/manishpant1/ Manish Pant]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/dan-rosen-035a5150/ Daniel Rosen]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/englishsall/ English Sall]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/ritasembajwe/ Rita Sembajwe]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/joseph-sitienei-b8367bb7/ Joseph Sitienei]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/solomon-simba-6a73b437/ Solomon Simba]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/taufiqhs/ Taufiq Sitompul]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/spsood/ Sanjay Sood]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-stanley/ Richard Stanley]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/felix-sukums-42364938/ Felix Sukums]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/antonettetorres/ Antonette Torres]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/oliviavelez/ Olivia Velez]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-elizabeth-wala/ Elizabeth Wala]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/uwe-wahser-431ab95/ Uwe Wahser]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/watsonjacqui/ Jacqui Watson]
*[https://www.linkedin.com/in/azaghloul56/ Ahmed Zaghloul]
 
==Digital Square Contacts==
* Carl Fourie, PRC Chair and Deputy Director, Global Goods cfourie@path.org
* Maria Soc, Senior Program Assistant, msoc@path.org
* Caroline Osborne, Project Administrator, cosborne@path.org

Latest revision as of 16:55, 5 October 2023

Digital Square's Peer Review Committee (PRC) comprises a diverse set of the foremost leaders and thinkers in digital health technology including country governments, donor organizations, implementing organizations, technology vendors, and other constituencies. The PRC plays a critical role as technical experts who assess the technical and programmatic appropriateness of submitted concept notes and applications through Digital Square Notices. The PRC provides feedback, which helps the Digital Square Board to prioritize investments in high-quality digital health products and services.

The Peer Review Committee is bound by the Peer Review Committee Membership Policy, which has been approved by the Board. Any substantive changes to the policies require board approval.

Current Membership

Digital Square's Peer Review Committee is comprised of the following individuals:

Digital Square Contacts

  • Carl Fourie, PRC Chair and Deputy Director, Global Goods cfourie@path.org
  • Maria Soc, Senior Program Assistant, msoc@path.org
  • Caroline Osborne, Project Administrator, cosborne@path.org
Retrieved from "https://wiki.digitalsquare.io/index.php?title=Peer_Review_Committee&oldid=2382"